Is
Rick Warren A New Ager?
Does Rick Warren Promote the New Age?
Are New Age Doctrines Being Taught By Rick Warren?
Does Rick Warren Support the New Age Movement?
One of the most bizarre, yet
popular,
accusations being made against Rick Warren is that he is a New Ager who
is spreading New Age doctrines/ideas/views via his influential
platform. This, according to his most vehement critics, is a sign of
the end-times and the coming apostasy—i.e., the great falling
away
where many will be deceived by the forces of darkness! The widespread
popularity of this delusion with regard to Warren seems to be the
result of a book titled Deceived
on Purpose by Warren Smith, an ex-New Ager who sees the
New Age Movement under virtually every rock and around every bush (see
my article Warren Smith: Self-Deceived On Purpose).
The
only problem, of course, is that Rick Warren has consistently and
boldly denounced the New Age movement and everything connected to it,
including its skewed view of "God" (i.e., pantheism and/or
panentheism). But
to clear up any remaining questions about whether or not Warren is in
any way seeking to spread pantheism, we need only look at what he
himself has stated on the subject. Warren, in fact, has spoken
out very harshly against the New
Age on many occasions.
Consider these remarks from 1989: "One of the most amazing
things to me is the popularity of
the New Age Movement. It takes more faith to believe in that than it
does to believe in Christianity. It is the most illogical, irrational
thing" (Rick Warren, October 8, 1989, "God’s Purpose for Your
Life"). And in a sermon the previous
year,
Warren declared: "[God] can be in many, many places all at the same
time. He’s everywhere. That does not mean that God is
everything.
That’s pantheism. Don’t confuse the creator with
His
creation. He’s not everything but He is everywhere" (Warren,
"Where Is God When You Need Him?," 1988).
Then,
during a 1997 sermon, Warren made the following condemnation of the New
Age, paying particular attention to the false notion that God is
everything, everything is God, and we are God (i.e., pantheism):
"[F]or other people peace means trying new age gimmicks, like gazing at crystals, or using aromatherapy, or sitting in a lotus position and contemplating lint in their navel and going, 'Ommmmm.' But that's not peace of mind either. Let me tell you what real peace of mind is. Real peace of mind is having a relationship with Jesus Christ, God's Son, and becoming friends with God" (Ministry ToolBox, issue #80, 12/11/2002)
Clearly, Warren is not a New Ager. Far from it. In fact, there are a number of articles by various authors at pastors.com and representatives of Warren at purposedriven.com that have repeatedly criticized the New Age movement, its beliefs, its agenda, and its proponents. Consider the following examples:"Has Purpose Driven been influenced by New Age 'theology'? Not at all. Purpose Driven is founded on the same beliefs that disciples of Jesus Christ have held for the last 2,000 years. . . . In contrast, "New Age" is a catch-all label for a hodgepodge of primitive religious beliefs accepted by some people who are looking for salvation in something other than Christ. Many New Agers believe in pantheism—the idea that everything is God and God is everything. Notions of karma and reincarnation are fashionable in those circles. Some New Age groups teach that each person is a potential god, others that all religions are equally valid paths to one universal Ultimate Reality. 'But we know that there is only one God, the Father, who created everything, and we exist for him. And there is only one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom God made everything and through whom we have been given life'" ("Who We Are; FAQ").
On a very personal level, I can say (and prove) that Rick Warren stands diametrically opposed to the New Age based on his endorsements of two of my own books, both of which include lengthy and detailed refutations of: 1) the New Age movement as a whole; and 2) various doctrines promoted by the New Age. These two books are: Defending the Faith: A Beginner's Guide to Cults and New Religions; and its companion volume Cults, New Religious Movements and Your Family (see these reviews from Answers In Action).
The first book (Defending the Faith) refutes several New Age concepts/teachings: pantheism, Jesus as just an "Ascended Master," impersonal nature of the Holy Spirit, the "illusion" of sin (there is neither true right, nor true wrong; no actual good, and no actual evil), and the non-literal resurrection of Jesus. Regarding this volume, Warren stated: "Richard Abanes has done a brilliant job of describing complex theological truths in an easy-to-understand style. I enthusiastically recommend this book."Despite the clarity of Warren's
position, many critics have continued to assert that he is most
definitely a New Ager simply because he has occasionally quoted, cited,
or referred to various individuals who could indeed be connected to the
New Age. But this doe snot make him a New Ager and more than his
quoting of the atheist Bertrand Russell (1872–1970)—"Unless you assume
God, the question of life’s purpose is meaningless"—ties him to atheism.
Warren
feels, and I do
too, that a person does not have to be a Christian in order to make an
astute observation, or say something that is true. All "truth"—wherever
it may be found—is God’s truth. A true observation about the way people
think or feel is a true observation, no matter who says it. So if I
quote something that is true in
order to make a point, then it really does not matter who said it,
whether it was a Buddhist, an atheist, or a space alien!
On my own
website, for instance, I have quoted Oscar Wilde, who said: "Music is the art
which is most nigh to tears and memory." Does this link me in any way to
homosexuality? Hardly.
Christians as far back as the first
century were quoting pagans in hopes of communicating the truths of the
Gospel. They saw that unbelievers, including the Greek philosophers,
had made astute observations about God and possessed some truths
consistent with Christianity. In the Gospel of John, for instance,
we find the Greek word logos (“Word”) being used to describe Jesus.
Logos was a Greek philosophical term that represented "reason" as a
sort of bridge between the unreachable God and earthly matter. Hence,
Jesus, as the eternal logos, is the bridge between God and man.
Like
John, Paul the apostle also quoted various pagans in his attempts to
share the good news of Jesus Christ with the unbelieving world. The following is excerpted from my book Rick Warren and the Purpose that Drives Him.

Are we now going to say that John and Paul can (or should be) tied to Greek paganism? I don't think so.